Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Nov 2022 23:56:17 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        python@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 264990] devel/py-Jinja2: Update to 3.1.2
Message-ID:  <bug-264990-21822-idQo6XmJ38@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-264990-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-264990-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D264990

--- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
Copied from bug 260440 comment 4 ...

@Yuri This sphinx update caused a regression.

This port is maintained by python@, nivit@ just happened to be assigned to
nivit@.=20

The correct/better course of action would have been a reset of assignee to
python@ (as it wasn't on our radar). It was an assignee timeout, not a
maintainer timeout.

Not withstanding, comment 1 detailed what was necessary to progress, which
wasn't ack'd.

The missing bulk / consumer  build test would have picked up the regression.

Further, this update was for 3.0.3 (which wouldn't have broken the build)

The commit updating to 3.1 should have gone through a cycle on this issue,
including updating the summary to match.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-264990-21822-idQo6XmJ38>