Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:45:39 -0500 From: Mikhail Teterin <Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com> To: Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt33 Makefileports/x11-toolkits/qt33/filespatch-src-kernel-qrichtext.cpp Message-ID: <200411170945.39693.Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com> In-Reply-To: <200411170654.14540.andy@athame.co.uk> References: <200411162325.iAGNPBMk007979@repoman.freebsd.org> <200411170654.14540.andy@athame.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=D7=A6=D7=D4=CF=D2=CF=CB 16 =CC=C9=D3=D4=CF=D0=C1=C4 2004 23:54, Andy Fawce= tt =F7=C9 =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC=C9: > > While here, stop requiring exact versions of png, jpeg, and mng -- > > anything the user's system has at the time of port-building will > > satisfy Qt. > > This second part was not approved, you asked us in a separate mail about > this which I replied to 5 afters after your commit (I was sleeping). Woops... Sorry. It is now obvious, that I mistook your second letter=20 (<200411162333.13967.andy@athame.co.uk>) for the second approval. > While I cannot immediately see a problem with the changes to qt33/Makefil= e, > I have no way of checking that Qt will work with alternative versions of > this library, as I don't have them. These libraries would be earlier or later versions installed by the same=20 ports. The official package is unchanged, since bento-cluster will use the= =20 latest versions of all ports anyway. But if a particular user still has=20 libX.so.V, building qt33 will not require him to also rebuild X because qt3= 3=20 explicitly requires V+k (for some natural k) -- which would fail, because t= he=20 new version of X will refuse to install over the old one. Qt does not care if it is jpeg.9 or jpeg.10, &c and should not pretend to. I wish, the practice was wider spread... > > Approved by: Andy Fawcett (as part of kde@ -- the maintainers) > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.176 +4 -4 ports/x11-toolkits/qt33/Makefile > > Maybe a forced commit on this one to show that I did not approve it, and = as > far as I can see from the kde@ list mail, nobody else on the team did > either. Ok. Sorry once again for misunderstanding. Yours, -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411170945.39693.Mikhail.Teterin>