Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:45:39 -0500
From:      Mikhail Teterin <Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com>
To:        Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt33 Makefileports/x11-toolkits/qt33/filespatch-src-kernel-qrichtext.cpp
Message-ID:  <200411170945.39693.Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com>
In-Reply-To: <200411170654.14540.andy@athame.co.uk>
References:  <200411162325.iAGNPBMk007979@repoman.freebsd.org> <200411170654.14540.andy@athame.co.uk>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

в╕второк 16 листопад 2004 23:54, Andy Fawcett Ви написали:
> >   While here, stop requiring exact versions of png, jpeg, and mng --
> >   anything the user's system has at the time of port-building will
> > satisfy Qt.
>
> This second part was not approved, you asked us in a separate mail about
> this which I replied to 5 afters after your commit (I was sleeping).

Woops... Sorry. It is now obvious, that I mistook your second letter 
(<200411162333.13967.andy@athame.co.uk>) for the second approval.

> While I cannot immediately see a problem with the changes to qt33/Makefile,
> I have no way of checking that Qt will work with alternative versions of
> this library, as I don't have them.

These libraries would be earlier or later versions installed by the same 
ports. The official package is unchanged, since bento-cluster will use the 
latest versions of all ports anyway. But if a particular user still has 
libX.so.V, building qt33 will not require him to also rebuild X because qt33 
explicitly requires V+k (for some natural k) -- which would fail, because the 
new version of X will refuse to install over the old one.

Qt does not care if it is jpeg.9 or jpeg.10, &c and should not pretend to.

I wish, the practice was wider spread...

> >   Approved by:     Andy Fawcett   (as part of kde@ -- the maintainers)
> >
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   1.176     +4 -4      ports/x11-toolkits/qt33/Makefile
>
> Maybe a forced commit on this one to show that I did not approve it, and as
> far as I can see from the kde@ list mail, nobody else on the team did
> either.

Ok. Sorry once again for misunderstanding. Yours,

	-mi


help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411170945.39693.Mikhail.Teterin>