Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 14:48:54 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org>, "jenkins-admin@freebsd.org" <jenkins-admin@freebsd.org>, Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, Garrett Cooper <ngie@freebsd.org>, Bryan Venteicher <bryanv@freebsd.org>, Alan Cox <alc@freebsd.org>, Jeremie Le Hen <jlh@freebsd.org>, kan@freebsd.org, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9 - Build #85 - Failure Message-ID: <4F580998-6BEC-453D-9021-D8D5F9327F2E@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <26638.1434317325@chaos> References: <1946759092.21.1434275152705.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> <CAJ-Vmok-gSsKp2v8Vo4dvqxaJKYdbOLpBgWGTjOM9cJ-obB5VA@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=rPVcK-XTUMC-GWntpreysUafHdhs7K%2BYice=updcX9Y7TiA@mail.gmail.com> <19058.1434316691@chaos> <39D19CBC-B00A-474D-83CA-6DDA618EDD58@gmail.com> <26638.1434317325@chaos>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Jun 14, 2015, at 14:28, Simon J. Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net> wrote:
> Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 14, 2015, at 14:18, Simon J. Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> + make -j 4 CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=amd64-gcc buildworld
>>>> __MAKE_CONF=/builds/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/make.conf
>>>> make: "/builds/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/Makefile" line 102: Malformed
>>>> conditional (${MK_META_MODE} == "yes")
>>>
>>> That would imply that src/share/mk isn't being used?
>>>
>>> I'm not sure when Warner changed the default MAKESYSPATH to be
>>> .../share/mk
>>> but that would be the right thing to do:
>>
>> That’s only present on head.
>
> The default? yes I think it went back and forth a bit.
> But you can use
>
> make -m .../share/mk
>
> on 10.0
Yes, however… the problem is that there’s a _huge_ discrepancy in build machinery between 10 and 11. Also, some of the changes were MFCed, but not before 10.1 was cut.
There are some other items that need to be MFCed as well, like r279247. That change needs to be run through make tinderbox though on ref10-amd64, and ideally on a 10.0-RELEASE/10.1-RELEASE image as the ref10 servers run 10-STABLE IIRC.
Thanks!
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVffbGAAoJEMZr5QU6S73e+7IH/2xldN2vzzD/EGDQ+9R1hFPO
nVRpQnS/JXXQAFrgJ/QGd+/6gGITZsr02m+1cgMNcOPjqLVgUUP+RIFS2h5Vaknh
uLvPx8CCUi2ePf3sGK4zL4nZccXGKWZBdS4jnm/mgVBpJU+3dsMV+iVFE2fvxLbq
FW3S007TJzrOFR/nmf4CPBnOwlVhyHvBmaG7xb/r76zdXc2HJbaHVv2UC4W4Xokz
r6j12A+cN34mBcdcvtCRIjtXIrLhLc/0BoZl70YzstEdsuG0qHgPUR8R5e1nfUDI
WHheEmnAOr5CVZ8XAi5q4qE/j7U95c707YBLAnGriS3nB+HaKC+JwbY4y43+TOs=
=TXtZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F580998-6BEC-453D-9021-D8D5F9327F2E>