Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:32:52 -0700
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
To:        Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
Cc:        chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Advice on consulting (was: Re: Advice on how to straighten out acrappy  ISP)
Message-ID:  <3EF0A244.24D5E1C2@mindspring.com>
References:  <3EEFC568.70900@potentialtech.com> <3EF02D44.EF07CE6E@mindspring.com> <3EF073EB.9010206@potentialtech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Moran wrote:
> I just don't understand why I have to
> pay for the service, then go out of my way to actually get it to
> work.  I must be a shitty salesman, as I know lots of companies that
> have things broken, yet don't need anyone to fix them.

OK, this is going to be a long response, since you have related
it to your recent attempts to break into the consulting business...

--

Up front: you were not in a consulting relationship with your
ISP, you were in a customer relationship.  You didn't show up
at their door, and you were attempting to play the "squeaky
wheel" card, rather than legitimately attempting in any way
that had the potential for success to obtain their business and
solve the problem at the same time.

You can use these tactics, which, while legal and ethical, amount
to economic blackmail in the limit ...or an education for them: a
happy customer tells, on average, 3 people; an unhappy one tells
on average 20 people.  In a business where word of mouth is a
factor in future business (e.g. you must rely on repeat sales or
patronage), it's generally worth taking the short term loss for
the long term gain.

--

On to consulting...

There is at least a minor amount of salesmanship involved, but
that can be learned.  Worst case, take a sales job, where you
work on commission, the customers are handed out round-robin or
otherwise allocated on a basis other than "first vulture to
swoop down on potential customer", and there are older sales
guys around who will feel enough pain at a poor job that one
will take you under their wing.  And then learn sales.

Probably that's a too drastic approach that's overkill for the
situation, however, unless you really, really suck at selling
yourself.


Any commercial transaction has to be win/win for everyone to be
satisfied with it, and everyone must be satisfied in order to
be able to call it successful.

In terms of "lots of companies have things broken, yet don't
need anyone to fix them", if you are selling "fixit services",
then you need to stop thinking like an engineer for a minute,
and start thinking like your potential customer.   Your
customer most likely realizes what's broken, and could probably
tell you 10 more things that you don't know about(*) that were
more pressing.

The first step in doing this is to realize that business has
very little to do with technical merits, even if it's nominally
a technical business, such as an ISP.  It's about cost/benefit
calculations.  If something costs more to leave alone than it
costs to change, then it will be changed.  This is true of any
good business; excellent businesses will have some additional
reluctance to change.  This is because they will also consider
the time value of money for the cost of making the change, and
will make the decision on that basis.

For example, take your ISP.  Say it would cost them $5,000 to
make the fix, and that this will result in them getting a 3%
return over 6 months (e.g. the will lose $150 less in terms of
amortized customer losses because of the problem, compared to
normal customer attrition to broadband, wireless, etc.).

Now the question is not whether or not they want that extra 3%
(they certaily do), but whether or not there is something else
that they can do with the $5,000 that will net them say a 6%
return, or a 17% return, over the same period.  If there is,
that $5,000 means $850; so there is a net loss of $700 in terms
of time value of money for fixing the problem vs. doing whatever
else they could have done with the money.

Your job in these situations is to provide the highest time value
for the money that you are asking them to spend, compared to all
their other options.

Now realize that you also don't have an existing business supplier
relationship with them, and that this increases their perceived
risk.  They take their perceived percentage chance that you will
"flake on them" (fail to provide the services) and they have to
calculate their real rate of return, rather than their internal
rate of return, on that basis.  So the calculation changes.  Let's
say you aren't incorporated, they don't know you from Adam (you
are cold-calling them), and you haven't established an industry
reputation from which you can either draw local referrals, or you
can draw referrals in their market or market segment; but lets say
you have the necessary paper credentials.  They calculate your
chances of "flaking" at 30%.  Here's the calculation, if you
convince them of a 17% IRR (internal rate of return):

	17% * (100% - 30%) = 11.9%

...so they better not have better than 11.9% return on some other
deal, if you want to get the work.

You can raise their perceived value for the work by dropping your
contract rates, with the understanding that you are doing it to
get your foot in the door -- that they will allow you to use them
as a referral account -- and not because you value yourself lower,
or because you were trying to high-ball them before.  They will
understand that you are ofsetting the 30% value by increasing the
17% value, rather than perceiving the overallcost/value ratio as
being less than they tought (the value was 117%; if you lower their
perception of the value, then you lower the 17% number without
geting anything in return).

And that's my sermon on that subject.

--

(*) Let them; you will likely find yourself doing some or all of
that work, in the customer's priority order, if you are willing to
shut up, listen to them, take good mental notes the first time
through their list, and then offer to fix them.  Mental notes are
important, because you are about to turn a casual conversation
into a negotiation, and they will clam up if you start taking paper
notes on their problems, since that's sensitive information.  There's
time for paper notes later, in the Statement Of Work Negotiation.

-- Terry



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EF0A244.24D5E1C2>