Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:50:44 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Cc: "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r273755 - head Message-ID: <20141028065043.GC26796@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <CAGHfRMCKQtDxovQ%2BYybO7nfBOcaHSKrJgWnnLaGb6w%2BBEBi4xw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201410272331.s9RNV8pJ058121@svn.freebsd.org> <CAGHfRMCKQtDxovQ%2BYybO7nfBOcaHSKrJgWnnLaGb6w%2BBEBi4xw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 05:26:42PM -0700, NGie Cooper wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Author: bapt > > Date: Mon Oct 27 23:31:07 2014 > > New Revision: 273755 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/273755 > > > > Log: > > Rename XFLAGS to XCFLAGS and XXFLAGS to XCXXFLAGS > > > > This is less confusing names and actually more reflexting what they are intended > > to. > > > > Discussed with: brooks > > Add an UPDATING entry? Well XCFLAGS and XCXXFLAGS are inernal only and concerning a feature (external toolchain) which is still WIP so it is worth adding an UPDATING entry? regards, Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlRPPMMACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez7lQCfcw+SDWVVJJ+Oz5h2/xsYIx1M zi0An3Jsk6vlfMhrNEt6Lrh2wJoOVBxr =kmIJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141028065043.GC26796>