Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:25:04 +0300 From: Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: when should 5.x be stable enough for web servers Message-ID: <200308221125.04804.andy@athame.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20030822081527.GE752@hermes.nixsys.be> References: <200308161810.38287.eqe@cox.net> <20030822081527.GE752@hermes.nixsys.be>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 22 August 2003 11:15, Philip Paeps wrote:
> On 2003-08-16 18:10:38 (-0400), Eriq Lamar <eqe@cox.net> wrote:
> > On i386 hardware and two processors amd mp. should I wait for 5.2.
>
> I've been running 5.1-current on a few servers, and I've not bumped
> into any serious problems. I have -stable machines nearby 'just in
> case' though, and my backups are fairly thorough :-)
I've had my personal webserver running on a 5.0R box for many months
now, with no problems.
It's running an Apache/PHP/MySQL mix, but I will freely admit that it's
hardly loaded.
Thinking about it, I probably should upgrade it to at least 5.1R ;)
A.
--
Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk
| tap@kde.org
"In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org
we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200308221125.04804.andy>