Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Aug 2001 01:08:22 +0400
From:      "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG, bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: CFR: fseek<0 + feof error (with fix)
Message-ID:  <20010811010820.A16395@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200108102100.f7AL03x37506@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
References:  <20010810232939.A14964@nagual.pp.ru> <20010810234922.A15324@nagual.pp.ru> <200108102100.f7AL03x37506@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 17:00:03 -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> 
> No, [EOVERFLOW] is for Large File Summit support.

Of course for it too, but it is the other end of the valid range. 

As it says, "the resulting file offset would be a value which cannot be
represented correctly" and it cannot be, because range overflow occurse in
the calculation process, not given directly in arguments, as for EINVAL.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010811010820.A16395>