Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:42:15 -0600 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Ryan Dooley <ryan@third-man.com> Cc: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu>, Gerrit K?hn <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems? Message-ID: <20030130214215.GF17299@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20030130212410.GB64983@elvis.mu.org> References: <20030127174127.GD71664@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <Pine.LNX.4.50.0301281141100.28577-100000@scribble.fsn.hu> <20030128110125.GB78630@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <Pine.LNX.4.50.0301281617500.28577-100000@scribble.fsn.hu> <20030128155501.GD78630@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <Pine.LNX.4.50.0301281902090.28577-100000@scribble.fsn.hu> <20030130212410.GB64983@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jan 30), Ryan Dooley said: > > Just try to fsck 1.2 TB and you will be very-very patient :) > > Very patient indeed. I've got a 1.0TB partition about 51% full. > It's still a 4-STABLE system and the last fsck from a crash last > Friday (bad IBM, bad, no soup for you) took just about 55 minutes to > fsck. *ugh* Dropping the number of inodes really helps fsck time; what does "df -i /bigfilesystem" print? > I'm torture testing on a 600GB partition and I was hoping to maybe > roll to 5.x around March. It's probably a good thing that I didn't > jump on it right away :-) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030130214215.GF17299>