Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:20:49 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Ana Kukec <anchie@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r211501 - in head/sys: modules modules/send netinet netinet6 sys Message-ID: <4C701901.8030505@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <7186318F-0921-41E5-9641-3D6B45E0623B@FreeBSD.org> References: <201008191131.o7JBV4Yf002412@svn.freebsd.org> <4C6D18BE.2000905@fer.hr> <4C6D95A8.9070105@FreeBSD.org> <20100819213159.B48418@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4C6DDB74.3090102@FreeBSD.org> <7186318F-0921-41E5-9641-3D6B45E0623B@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/21/2010 05:07, Rui Paulo wrote: >> Meanwhile, the fact that in the past code has been committed >> without man pages is the exact cause of the problem you're >> describing. It is certainly not a justification for continuing to >> do it wrong. > > Reverting code just because it doesn't have a man page is pointless. > Everyone can write the damn man page, but not everyone can write > code. You should really take this into consideration when proposing a > commit to be reverted. So let's assume that having lots of code in the tree without a man page is a problem. Further, let's assume that we don't want the problem to get worse. How do you propose that we accomplish that? Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C701901.8030505>