Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:42:55 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP is stable now. Whee! :) Message-ID: <20010422114255.F51968@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <15074.2220.727775.544765@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>; from gallatin@cs.duke.edu on Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 06:24:44PM -0400 References: <15074.138.446582.781725@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <XFMail.010421145946.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <15074.2220.727775.544765@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, 21 April 2001 at 18:24:44 -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > John Baldwin writes: >>> >>> I'm happy to report that with this patchset, plus the >>> cricical_enter/exit changes I just committed, a dual cpu 2100 made it >>> through a buildworld last night just fine ;) >> >> Woo! The dual 4100 here is still cranking through a -j 8 world. > > What's the appropriate -j level for an MP box, anyway? > > I just naively used -j 2. Should I go higher? I've always used 2 * numcpus. If I go higher, it seems to take longer. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010422114255.F51968>