Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:11:22 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New hardware, old problem: stuck beacon when here is WiFi traffic Message-ID: <1887397692.20130428121122@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmonpc6rMKfT3qHme4Yzwkcj0zij8dYzXktpbz3bbSmT0=Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <2810538978.20130423164137@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmom4UDoz7EgdnVeQ%2BALuFFXkH9t_Uj7=FwL77S5rKfUD1g@mail.gmail.com> <1813905823.20130423184528@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-VmomhRaKODxis09MjAhUbAUOw%2B6jWBY48JpZR_JgfZZLKcQ@mail.gmail.com> <184105677.20130424002002@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-VmokVmHDXwE7S5koSqtFjPXQ_VUPhj8gfMruDM2k-DyUMPw@mail.gmail.com> <1936997795.20130424003555@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmokx2QhcjcsgA-_kqjX63Vu4CLk7HkuyALautbnzp61ywQ@mail.gmail.com> <886711115.20130424004702@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-VmoksSTBC7jmC-_hvBeJFSD0k28HoZodaWdHm0AF0d1yZJg@mail.gmail.com> <6010292503.20130426001447@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-VmomUsPgHTVGaKHZ_YE%2Bu1ZOjGqrVfh2uYmvOs6gKmhnxOw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokZBbmHbruKJV-8kvTyOTsiq5_XHnfqUYo3vO68872Q=w@mail.gmail.com> <99510815.20130426122508@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-VmoktRPbnDRbRuwA4i8w50kExs2pwD4yBawL6iOz7F4Bknw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonCao99MOrm97tQS_f1xS9tieQfg-nQUB4APWVmdJJUBg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmonxz3spCYeM5b3ijBgnM6wfjTa%2Bv5j8pb nX%2B-_Sg4hSGw@mail.gmail.com> <777510536.20130427123352@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmonpc6rMKfT3qHme4Yzwkcj0zij8dYzXktpbz3bbSmT0=Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Adrian. You wrote 27 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2013 =D0=B3., 22:56:30: >> AC> You're not doing something like leaving bgscan enabled, or not >> AC> defining a channel up front? >> Here is my config: > >> ifconfig_wlan0=3D"inet 192.168.135.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 mode 11ng cha= nnel 3:ht/40 -bgscan ssid home.serebryakov.spb.ru country DE regdomain row = txpower 30" AC> Is it a bridge? If so, put an IP address on the bridge, not wlan0. I don't have bridge, it is true router, to have strong separation between WiFi and wired network. AC> thus i do the inet line after _all_ other things are done, and on a AC> separate line. Two lines for one interface? Or just move "inet" part to end of this line? AC> Anyway, leave it how it is for now. Just update to the latest -HEAD AC> ath code and redo the testing. It will now log the whole TX queue AC> contents, not just the completed frames. Hopefully it'll be more AC> obvious. Ok, today later. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1887397692.20130428121122>