Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Fri, 19 Jun 2026 21:03:05 +0000 (UTC)
From:      "Alexander Ziaee" <ziaee@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" <des@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "src-committers" <src-committers@FreeBSD.org>, "dev-commits-src-all" <dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org>, "dev-commits-src-main" <dev-commits-src-main@FreeBSD.org>, "Artem Bunichev" <tembun@bk.ru>
Subject:   Re: git: b3dfd5d59c4a - main - rmdir.1: Document non-POSIX -v option
Message-ID:  <E1wagMk-00012M-0O@rmmprod07.runbox>
In-Reply-To: <865x3euvwz.fsf@ltc.des.dev>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail 

On 2026-06-19 16:17 -04:00 EDT, "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" <des@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Alexander Ziaee <ziaee@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> @@ -104,6 +104,10 @@ The
>>  utility is expected to be
>>  .St -p1003.2
>>  compatible.
>> +.Pp
>> +The
>> +.Fl v
>> +option is an extension to that specification.
> 
> This is not the wording we normally use for these cases.

We use in in rm(1), but we do not have a style guide and I am not aware of a consistent pattern. What would you prefer?

Best,
Alex
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1wagMk-00012M-0O>