Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:09:50 +0100 From: Volker <volker@vwsoft.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getting garbage faster using FreeBSD? Message-ID: <45DA121E.1040803@vwsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20070219195143.GA42379@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <45D9FD35.6040702@vwsoft.com> <20070219195143.GA42379@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/19/07 20:51, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:40:37PM +0100, Volker wrote: >> The tape sits there since 48 hours writing a block of data every >> other minute and still didn't fill up the tape completely. The >> system this is running on is a P-4 3GHz machine using FreeSBIE 2.0 >> (6.2-RELEASE based). >> >> I suspect this to be a slow /dev/random. > > This sounds odd to me, I get 18-20MB/sec sustained read performance > from /dev/random on this 2GHz system, which is probably faster than > your tape write speed. Hmm, so this might be the tape drive(r)? I'll check this out as soon as I'm going to write to hard disk. I'm going to make some tests with /dev/random to get the real speed. >> Is there any chance to speed up /dev/random? Would a hifn >> accelerator card help here to get FreeBSD produce garbage faster? >> >> As there is medical data on all media I really need garbage >> (/dev/zero wouldn't be enough for data security as this might get >> recovered). > > Neither would a single pass with /dev/random, but you presumably knew > this. Yes, I know... I would like to run 5 or more passes if it's not that slow. Do you think playing with randoms' sysctl interface might influence performance? Does /dev/random automatically re-seed from time to time or is it seeded at boot time only? Thx, Volker
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45DA121E.1040803>