Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Sep 2001 21:30:05 -0600
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        Stephen McKay <mckay@thehub.com.au>
Cc:        Stephen McKay <mckay@thehub.com.au>, Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: RMS: A threat to society? 
Message-ID:  <4.3.2.7.2.20010919212628.04442b60@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <200109191347.f8JDl5i21378@dungeon.home>
References:  <4.3.2.7.2.20010918092037.046e2a90@localhost> <3BA3248D.5E47FDC9@mindspring.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010913023437.045fae70@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20010913002733.05261930@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20010912203732.0492cc80@localhost> <20010912225151.58FCD37B40B@hub.freebsd.org> <20010912215547.98067.qmail@web20806.mail.yahoo.com> <01091219512600.11358@proxy.the-i-pa.com> <20010912225428.A9675@citusc17.usc.edu> <4.3.2.7.2.20010913021952.045974f0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20010913185102.0497c9e0@localhost> <15266.22869.722204.601040@guru.mired.org> <3BA3248D.5E47FDC9@mindspring.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010918092037.046e2a90@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 07:47 AM 9/19/2001, Stephen McKay wrote:

>I suppose it could be illegal if RMS were a recognised software monopoly.

Not true. Anti-competitive tactics such as "dumping" for the purpose of
destroying businesses are illegal whether or not one has a monopoly. See 
the US's Robinson-Patman Act and the many state laws restricting unfair 
business practices. (I don't know what the statutes are Down Under, but
would wager that there are similar laws there. Probably stricter ones, 
in fact, based on what I *have* seen of Australian law.)

--Brett Glass


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20010919212628.04442b60>