Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:44:44 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request to test if_ath - TX power control changes Message-ID: <AANLkTimm3of9TOV1eC2ZB7djBSmOC2ZffzpR9CnYM6r_@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=zdkQ-H4KY=qpFqdLrRfgx1LmhoG8i5HQe_KWL@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTi=zdkQ-H4KY=qpFqdLrRfgx1LmhoG8i5HQe_KWL@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(You know, I'm very tempted to just create a FreeBSD-wireless mailing list.. :-) My AR9280/AR9285 collection just arrived in the post. A quick 2 minute test with the AR9285 showed that at least the one I have has issues TX'ing at higher 11g rates. I won't even bother testing 11n MCS rates until I fix that. If you have an AR9285 and you're able/willing to test out -HEAD then I'd appreciate it if you could do some iperf tests (both ways, so it's both TX'ing and RX'ing, but not at the same time please!) and then check out the rate control stats - sysctl dev.ath.0.sample_stats=1. Thanks! Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimm3of9TOV1eC2ZB7djBSmOC2ZffzpR9CnYM6r_>