Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 01:03:16 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.4/4.5-STABLE and ATA tags? Message-ID: <20020202000316.GA17443@emma1.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20020201122510.X9956-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> References: <m3sn8lxt2q.fsf@emma1.emma.line.org> <20020201122510.X9956-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002, Doug White wrote: > > Is this a problem with FreeBSD or with the drive? I read in the archives > > that IBM IC35L... had troubles in 4.5-PRE, and I tend to believe that > > IBM don't break all their tagged queueing firmware. > > ATA tagged queueing isn't exactly a standard, and don't put it past them > to break older code. :) If tags work for you, it's a bonus; if it > doesn't, disable it. Well, a short test of my DTLA-307045 on the VIA chip was ok with msdos and ext2fs (ext3 actually, but who cares for read-only), but if the implementation in the drive has changed, I'm interested to see what will happen soon, as I expect more drives to support tagged queueing now that it's been in the ATA drafts for some time. -- Matthias Andree "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020202000316.GA17443>