Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:28:45 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lockmgr: thread <..> unlocking unheld lock Message-ID: <200510141428.46595.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <17230.49819.985757.378764@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <17218.49812.271334.154595@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200510131530.16376.jhb@freebsd.org> <17230.49819.985757.378764@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 13 October 2005 04:24 pm, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > John Baldwin writes: > > On Wednesday 05 October 2005 02:00 pm, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > It also seems to have started happening on a second amd64 that I just > > > upgraded from a mid-august -current to CVS cvsupped yesterday. This > > > is a UP amd64 3000+.. > > > > Can you try reverting any of the recent changes to > > amd64/include/atomic.h? The ones to change foo_ptr() to take uintptr_t > > should be fine, but maybe try reverting the changes after that (not > > using +m for example). > > Inline asm is Greek to me, and I'd be no better than a monkey typing > at making changes like that. > > Would you like me to just try reverting all of 1.38? > > Drew Yes, that would work fine. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510141428.46595.jhb>