Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 21:09:48 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc/libm floating-point bug? Message-ID: <20030522040948.GA22637@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10305212134410.17941-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> References: <oprpju0hyu8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10305212134410.17941-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 09:44:57PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > I feel some will screem if we take away the ability to use > > > -march=pentium4 in places they know for sure will work. Unix is about > > > mechanisms, not policy. > > Why do we set CPUTYPE by default? We don't. -mcpu=pentiumpro produces i386-compatible code that is tuned for execution on a pentium pro. > This has bit me before also. > It seems to me that NO_CPU_CFLAGS=yes should be the default. > Even -mpentiumpro caused problems for me. How has it caused problems? Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+zE2MWry0BWjoQKURAjPjAKDqnK/Z/3HQ1aH6kDlk1KD05ap+5ACfe7DS eM/I7x7aLV46JPciFs9WueI= =os0D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030522040948.GA22637>