Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:20:32 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> Cc: powerpc@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc Message-ID: <86fwy9f5vj.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4C6E825C.5060509@freebsd.org> (Nathan Whitehorn's message of "Fri, 20 Aug 2010 08:25:48 -0500") References: <201008190304.o7J34Wa4089466@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <86occzdmhg.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4C6D557E.6080406@freebsd.org> <86sk29ws6u.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4C6E825C.5060509@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> writes: > Next up: tinderbox needs to build GENERIC64, not GENERIC, on > powerpc64. make buildkernel is programmed to do the right thing is you > don't pass a KERNCONF, but tinderbox apparently passes GENERIC > explicitly. This one's in your court! There is no way to fix this with the current tinderbox code. MHO is that the entire powerpc64 thing is very poorly thought out. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fwy9f5vj.fsf>