Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:13:39 +0100 (CET)
From:      "Cordula's Web" <cpghost@cordula.ws>
To:        hemi@puresimplicity.net
Cc:        eqe@cox.net
Subject:   Re: why support alpha??
Message-ID:  <200312101113.hBABDdo7066348@fw.farid-hajji.net>
In-Reply-To: <20031210054413.GA58841@just.puresimplicity.net> (message from Josh Tolbert on Tue, 9 Dec 2003 23:44:14 -0600)
References:  <200312092243.02269.eqe@cox.net> <20031210054413.GA58841@just.puresimplicity.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Isn't alpha dead? Why bother supporting them in 5.2 it seems like wasted
> > energy. Yes people still use it but for them there is 4.9 which works
> > fine. You could better serve the freebsd community by focusing on the

> No, there's not a lot of future left for the architecture. The writing is on
> the wall, but some would say the same thing for sun4u. However, there's still
> lots of Alpha users running FreeBSD (as evidenced by this list) and the
> continuing Alpha development for FreeBSD.

Supporting as many architectures as possible is always good
for overall code portability, and therefore code quality.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200312101113.hBABDdo7066348>