Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:42:37 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r234353 - in head: . contrib/llvm contrib/llvm/include/llvm contrib/llvm/include/llvm-c contrib/llvm/include/llvm-c/Transforms contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT contrib/llvm/include/llvm/An... Message-ID: <4F928F1D.2080406@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120419211441.GA7744@freebsd.org> References: <201204162123.q3GLNSr6051133@svn.freebsd.org> <20120419211441.GA7744@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-04-19 23:14, Alexander Best wrote: > On Mon Apr 16 12, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> Author: dim >> Date: Mon Apr 16 21:23:25 2012 >> New Revision: 234353 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/234353 >> >> Log: >> Upgrade our copy of llvm/clang to trunk r154661, in preparation of the >> upcoming 3.1 release (expected in a few weeks). Preliminary release >> notes can be found at:<http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>; > > very nice. :) > > any reason '-fformat-extensions'-support still hasn't been pushed upstream as > something like '-fbsd-extensions'? Simply ENOTIME. The support as it is now, is not really acceptable for upstream, because it is rather a quick 'n dirty hack. :) Besides, llvm/clang 3.1 has branched for release, and only serious bugs will be fixed in there, from now on. So even if I got something whipped up right now, it would probably not make it in.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F928F1D.2080406>