Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:16:51 +0100 From: Matteo Riondato <matteo@freebsd.org> To: Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, ozawa@ongs.co.jp Subject: Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010 Message-ID: <20060110081651.GD42716@kaiser.sig11.org> In-Reply-To: <43C2472C.5070103@freebsd.org> References: <E1EuQjU-000JgQ-DK@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <43BD1054.7020409@ongs.co.jp> <43C2472C.5070103@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 08:21:16PM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote: > I have updated the patches: > > For 7-current patch: > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p3.diff > > For 6.x patch: > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p3.diff > > changes from -p2 to -p3: > - fixed problem of attribute associated with shadow dir > - fixed lock/unlock problem (-p2 is not enought of this) > - fixed initial treatment problem of some componentnames > > Please do the unionfs test with above new patch. I think that on sys/fs/unionfs/union_vfsops.c, line 116, done should be size_t, to have unionfs compiled on amd64 (and probably other !32bit archs) Best Regards -- Matteo Riondato FreeBSD Volunteer (http://freebsd.org) G.U.F.I. Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org) FreeSBIE Developer (http://www.freesbie.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060110081651.GD42716>