Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:47:07 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: "Ralf S. Engelschall" <rse@engelschall.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mdmfs broken? Message-ID: <20030306084707.GC13870@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20030305163645.GA61810@engelschall.com> References: <20030305163645.GA61810@engelschall.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 05:36:45PM +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> In article <20030305142802.GL4422@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> you wrote:
>
> > What's the correct syntax in 5-CURRENT to have a memory disk for /tmp
> > in your /etc/fstab?
> > [...]
>
> Create a symlink:
>
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5 Feb 13 13:28 /sbin/mount_mfs -> mdmfs
>
> and use in /etc/fstab something like:
>
> md0 /tmp mfs rw,-s128m,noatime,nosuid,nodev 0 0
Thanks! Any reason why there is no {sym,hard}link by default? The
manpage even mentions the compat-behaviour:
COMPATIBILITY
Full compatibility is enabled with the -C flag, or by starting mdmfs with
the name mount_mfs or mfs (as returned by getprogname(3)).
--Stijn
--
Nostalgia ain't what it used to be.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE+ZwsLY3r/tLQmfWcRAufoAKChvfOuR5VJbYXCp9lmmcIHbZw4ywCdFoN+
NpCg7K4JzOwScaDtjUZ34kw=
=Zsr/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030306084707.GC13870>