Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 01:18:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Ask Bjoern Hansen <ask@valueclick.com> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com>, asami@FreeBSD.ORG, hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: We seriously need a cleanup on ftp-master Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105100115310.5817-100000@impatience.valueclick.com> In-Reply-To: <20010507151321.A12712@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 7 May 2001, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 05:02:42PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > > > Er, no one will mirror them from FreeBSD-archive. So where will they get > > > them from? ftp-master.freebsd.org is not for user consumption. > > > > ftp.freebsd.org? That's the default site too. :) > > Perhaps I am out of touch... isn't ftp.freebsd.org going to be a rotating > CNAME to ftp*.freebsd.org (verified full mirrors of /pub/FreeBSD)? > Thus how is the common person going to get pub/FreeBSD-Archive? He'll go to ftp-archive.freebsd.org or whatever (which will point to a cluster of mirrors with those bits). [...] > As I said, maybe we need to consider subsidizing disk space if that is > the only reason someone would not mirror us [and has *FAT* pipes]. > $$ disk <<< $$ BW. But if you make it really painfree to start mirroring the whole "primary" mirror it would be easier to get lots of mirrors. Most of the bandwidth goes to the .iso's anyway and those are what there should be lots and lots and lots of mirrors of (so the bandwidth cost per site goes down). - ask -- ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do(); more than 100M impressions per day, http://valueclick.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0105100115310.5817-100000>