Date: Fri, 06 Jun 1997 16:11:25 -0700 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> To: Stefan Molnar <stefan@exis.net> Cc: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@MindBender.serv.net>, Jim Dixon <jdd@vbc.net>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UNIX vs NT Message-ID: <3398991D.5C11@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970606110235.28732A-100000@sailfish.exis.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stefan Molnar wrote: > > > And now back to the theme... > > Yeah, OS2 is a very cool product and has always been ages ahead of M$, > > but their marketing and technical support sucks :(. > > The marketing and tech does kinda have something less than to be desired. U tell me, this city has nearly 6 million people trapped in it, and there's only one person in IBM supporting OS2. > > I think of it this way, the majority of ATM machines use OS/2. I like > it. But that is coming from a guy that has a OS/2 Warp Server with SMP > doing an NFS mount to a FBSDbox. > ATM? You mean Automatic Teller Machines...we have Async. Transfer Mode and we don't have even one OS2 box there, to be honest not even an NT box ! I have OS2 Warp 3.0 on a nice box: I reinstalled win3.1 after a conflict between the video and audio (Compaq loves M$ :-( ). Don't you wish fbsd supported HPFS? ;-) Pedro. > Stefan > > "...Alll things are good, esp. an axe to a troubled server." > -Said while on a caffeine high >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3398991D.5C11>