Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Oct 2004 07:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:      David Raistrick <drais@atlasta.net>
To:        "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: Need 'remote power bar' recommendations ...
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.50L0.0410040729210.94815-100000@fryit.atlasta.net>
In-Reply-To: <20041003154333.B96717@ganymede.hub.org>
References:  <A8535F8D62F3644997E91F4F66E341FC9E33DC@exchange.sandvine.com> <20041003154333.B96717@ganymede.hub.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>
> Any particular model, or they are all good?  Found this one, which appears
> to do what I want ...
>
>          http://www.kvms.com/nav/item.asp?item=4228


I've got 4 of the Baytech RPC3's (the last part of the number, ie -15NC
describes the plug style.) and one WTI unit.

I prefer the Baytech's over the WTI, though the WTI has been shelved for
about a year now.  As someone else mentions, it does have problems if you
disconnect a telnet session without logging out...you'll have to wait a
bit.

Oh, and the RPC3's are 1u instead of 2...that helps. :)


They both work well, though.  Memory says the Baytechs have a bit more
per-port power-usage reporting, etc, but I don't really remember now.


...david

---
david raistrick        http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
drais@atlasta.net             http://www.expita.com/nomime.html



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.50L0.0410040729210.94815-100000>