Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 00:38:55 +0000 From: Johannes Totz <jo@bruelltuete.com> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Call for Foundation-supported Project Ideas Message-ID: <01e739f7-ccb2-c59f-9843-9d5214032b77@bruelltuete.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2DaDsn9oq1-pXysJ702wjO3kGAhmtKVHz9AnJYAtjwdhA@mail.gmail.com> References: <861r36xzpe.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> <20211128220732.GA81140@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <d0c77bfe-6a37-e177-f64d-2e1d3fc23dc2@gmail.com> <20211129003635.GA81568@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAPyFy2DaDsn9oq1-pXysJ702wjO3kGAhmtKVHz9AnJYAtjwdhA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29/11/2021 03:17, Ed Maste wrote: > On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:37, Steve Kargl > <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> It's certainly not the latest and greatest, >> CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7250 @ 2.00GHz (1995.04-MHz K8-class CPU) > > If you're content to use a compiler from a package you can save a lot > of time by building with `CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=llvm13` and > `WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes`. Or, instead of WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN perhaps > `WITHOUT_CLANG=yes`, `WITHOUT_LLD=yes` and `WITHOUT_LLDB=yes`. (re-send to list, sorry) Can we disconnect the compiler optimisation flag for base and clang? I don't need the compiler to be build with -O2 but I want the resulting base system to have optimisations enabled. Right now, looks like both get -O2 and a lot of time is spent on optimising the compiler (for no good reason).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01e739f7-ccb2-c59f-9843-9d5214032b77>