Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:00:23 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Danial Thom <danial_thom@yahoo.com> Cc: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Initial 6.1 questions Message-ID: <20060613210022.GB5267@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060613195738.64419.qmail@web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <448F0C20.3090800@samsco.org> <20060613195738.64419.qmail@web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 12:57:38PM -0700, Danial Thom wrote: > Since everyone agrees that the load measuring > tools aren't all that accurate, what criteria was > used to determine that the changes made in 7 have > the effect that you think they have had? Not by using top(1). vmstat seems to do a better job of reporting CPU usage, but still you want to measure what the system can actually do, not how accurately it estimates its own performance. Kris --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEjydmWry0BWjoQKURArK6AJ90ePQZLwsLX8OCVZtSEK5NVw9gYgCg+z1z LeLrJqpW5EZxLdm9/UlV17A= =Uq9m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060613210022.GB5267>