Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 21:14:10 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: alasir@supereva.it Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: param.h Message-ID: <20030316051410.GA33734@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030315045735.28036.qmail@web40308.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20030315045735.28036.qmail@web40308.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Are you trying to compile the -stable version of gcc? We make significant > > modifications to integrate it within our environment. I would not at all > > be suprised if the -stable version of gcc doesn't build on -current. ... > > You are aware that there are gcc ports set up to configure the FSF trees > > specifically for use on FreeBSD, right? And that includes gcc-2.95.4. ... On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 08:57:35PM -0800, Rhett Monteg Hollander wrote: > Well, I was able to build it on -CURRENT, along with binutils > and other fine software from -STABLE tree. The reason was that > in several cases GCC 3.2.1 proved to be significantly slower > than 2.95.4 (I mean regular integer\floating-point operations, > MMX\SSE\3DNow! is a whole different story). I replaced 3.2.1 > with 2.95.4, and since I did so in very brute way, latter had > no clue where system includes are, and ld had amnesia too You really, really want to just use the /usr/ports/lang/gcc295 port. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030316051410.GA33734>