Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 May 2003 23:07:48 +0200
From:      Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        jeff@walters.name
Subject:   Re: Comment on devfs.conf
Message-ID:  <20030515210748.GC10171@freebie.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <3218.1053032141@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <200305151653.43540.jeff@walters.name> <3218.1053032141@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:55:41PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <200305151653.43540.jeff@walters.name>, Jeff Walters writes:
> >The new /etc/devfs.conf arrangement is a good thing but it doesn't work for 
> >devices that are created on the fly after boot, and it gives an error on 
> >wildcards on device names.  
> >
> >I suggest for /etc/rc.d/devfs that instead of changing the permissions and 
> >ownerships directly on device nodes, create a default devfs ruleset based on 
> >/etc/devfs.conf entries and apply the set.  For example, previously you could 
> >modify /etc/rc.devfs with the logic like:
> 
> I must admit that I should have looked at this, now that I have, I fully
> agree:  The policy setup at boot should be not just applied once, but
> made the default ruleset.

Would/should this be 5.1-R material?

-- 
|   / o / /_  _   		
|/|/ / / /(  (_)  Bulte		wilko@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030515210748.GC10171>