Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:57:01 -0800 From: "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Discussion of guidelines for additional version control mechanisms (fwd) Message-ID: <200203010057.QAA1546550@meer.meer.net> In-Reply-To: Message from Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> of "Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:54:36 EST." <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020228125054.70229B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Certainly -- the intent that I expressed in my original e-mail was to fish > for people's thoughts on the issue, which would then be codified in some > form. I'm interested in hearing a little more back on how people feel > about the notion of how larger projects should coordinate work given the > assumption that "locks" are advisory, but plan to write up a strawman > sometime in the next week or so. Probably the process forward there will > be to run the first pass by the core team for some immediate feedback > regarding the strength of the recommendations, and whether it meets our > goals concerning addressing the problems that have been discussed. Then > I'll spit a copy out for more general comments. Sounds like a great plan to me. Alas I think you'll get more feedback once you have the strawman proposal, people just seem to work that way. Later, George -- George V. Neville-Neil gnn@neville-neil.com NIC:GN82 "Those who would trade liberty for temporary security deserve neither" - Benjamin Franklin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203010057.QAA1546550>