Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:43:36 -0400 From: Brent Bloxam <brentb@beanfield.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple instances of MySQL Message-ID: <49DE4FE8.8090303@beanfield.com> In-Reply-To: <200904081117.58218.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> References: <49DAC610.6020404@pixelhammer.com> <5C4F1A401C316B7D2F625CCF@Macintosh-2.local> <49DB4D3E.3070301@pixelhammer.com> <200904081117.58218.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mel Flynn wrote: > Any reason a jail can't be used? This would allow sharing the binary using > null or union fs, little overhead, yet seperated from host install and no > maintenance of port installed files, like rc.d/mysql-server. Unionfs, unix sockets and flush operations don't like each other from what I know, so make sure your database directory and socket aren't going to be located on a unionfs mount and you should be okay. Someone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong on this, but I definitely haven't been able to get MySQL to play nice with unionfs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49DE4FE8.8090303>