Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 14:52:33 -0700 From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> To: Kai Grossjohann <kai.grossjohann@gmx.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup and portupgrade Message-ID: <200310081452.33984.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <86smm3igv9.fsf@slowfox.dyndns.org> References: <20031008113325.B11482@asu.edu> <200310081342.34224.kstewart@owt.com> <86smm3igv9.fsf@slowfox.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 02:01 pm, Kai Grossjohann wrote: > Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> writes: > > make index > > portsdb -u > > The docs for portsdb mention "portsdb -uU" (or was it "-Uu"?). Is > there a difference between "portsdb -U" and "make index"? What's > that difference? Kris has a script that checks "make index". There isn't anything that checks "portsdb -U". I also find that "make index" produces an INDEX.db with typically 1 port or more than "portsdb -U" does. I log the production of "make index" and I like to see a log like ruby# m make-index-20031008-1033.log Generating INDEX - please wait.. Done. Portsdb -U usually produces a lot more messages. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310081452.33984.kstewart>