Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:33:32 +0100 From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com> To: "Roger Marquis" <marquis@roble.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Survey Message-ID: <f34ca13c0605240233t1b3555dbn39f34b4d598d5bb7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060523083944.H96736@eboyr.pbz> References: <20060523120100.37D2B16A54F@hub.freebsd.org> <20060523083944.H96736@eboyr.pbz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23/05/06, Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> wrote: > All that said FreeBSD's ports are still the reference > implementation, head-and-shoulders better than up2date, yum, rpm, > apt-get, or anything else out there. I guess you haven't looked at OpenBSD's branch of FreeBSD's pkg_add(1), where they've added some cool support for automatic port updating, which seems to work quite well: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PkgUpdate http://www.openbsd.org/papers/ven05-espie/ Cheers, Constantine.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f34ca13c0605240233t1b3555dbn39f34b4d598d5bb7>