Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:58:03 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Trofimov Dmitry <trdmitry@inbox.ru> Cc: faq@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports tag Message-ID: <20031217135803.GA7699@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200312171128.36119.trdmitry@inbox.ru> References: <200312171128.36119.trdmitry@inbox.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:28:36AM +0200, Trofimov Dmitry wrote:
> when i update ports via cvsup i set tag=3D.
> but avaliable tag=3DRELEASE_5_2_0
> What difference betwen each other.
>=20
> is RELEASE_5_2_0 tag brach is stable ports collection?
> can i use it with my 4.9 FreebBSD?
No -- just carry on using the '.' (HEAD) tag to update your ports
tree. The RELEASE_5_2_0 tag is just that: a point in time tag to
indicate the state of the ports tree at the time that all of the
packages for inclusion with release 5.2 were compiled. It's not a
branch, and it's not worth tracking as it won't actually change.
Cheers,
Matthew
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/4GDrdtESqEQa7a0RAipXAKCdlD6sLBp0TDU2caDIAUWW0FcvnQCfYBVW
0hJ+So4k3fV/AwT/+EWPktI=
=gb3w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031217135803.GA7699>