Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:45:46 -0700 From: "Leland" <lsp3@gte.net> To: "Gary W. Swearingen" <swear@attbi.com>, "Dag-Erling Smorgrav" <des@ofug.org> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Code layout and debugging time Message-ID: <001501c309f2$7748c820$0201a8c6@Pentium166> References: <5.0.2.1.1.20030422171035.01c5e258@popserver.sfu.ca><5.0.2.1.1.20030422205617.0387b378@popserver.sfu.ca><ehadehc2qo.deh@localhost.localdomain> <xzpznmgevia.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I think the whole scheme was a response to a DOD requirement for using a > > PDL to specify the detailed design -- a "product" for one of the big > > steps of the waterfall software development process. I think the was > > something like one line of code per hour. > > The "industry average" (whatever that means) is 8-20 lines of correct > code per day, according to McConnell - and those who would dismiss him > simply because he is a Microsoft employee are close-minded bigots. Remember this is for a completed project through debug, Beta, Boxed and out the door. Leland Prince
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001501c309f2$7748c820$0201a8c6>