Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:29:39 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r214431 - head/bin/rm Message-ID: <4CC899C3.7040107@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20101027212601.GA78062@freebsd.org> References: <201010271848.o9RImNSR019344@svn.freebsd.org> <20101027212601.GA78062@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/27/10 14:26, Alexander Best wrote: > are in fact COW fs the only exception where the -P flag won't work? before > r213582 LFS was mentioned here and that the block size must be fixed. > also the comment in rm.c says that -P won't work for any logging file systems. > i'm not a fs expert, but i think mentioning that -P won't work for COW fs isn't > enough. What may be a better approach is to confirm the fs' that DO work, list them, and then add something to the effect of, "This feature is unlikely to work on other file systems." hth, Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CC899C3.7040107>