Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:52:49 +0700
From:      Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.pp.ru>
To:        Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su>
Cc:        net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: polling(4) rocks!
Message-ID:  <20041117185248.GA1394@grosbein.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20041117181351.GA48071@comp.chem.msu.su>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:13:51PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:

> The router box is a 1.4GHz Celeron PC with an fxp(4) interface split
> across a dozen of vlans.  There is nothing special about its setup
> except for ~250 rules loaded into ipfw2.  It is running 4.10-RELEASE.
> Without polling, it was able to switch full 10Mbytes/sec of traffic
> (~9kpps), but that took from 50 to 70% CPU time spent in interrupts.
> With polling on, interrupt time never exceeds 5% and it stays as low
> as 1-2% on average even when traffic is that high.

Does polling(4) increase latency? It is very imortant for router
that handles lots of RTP (VoIP) traffic.

Eugene


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041117185248.GA1394>