Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 18:37:45 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r251886 - in head: contrib/apr contrib/apr-util contrib/serf contrib/sqlite3 contrib/subversion share/mk usr.bin usr.bin/svn usr.bin/svn/lib usr.bin/svn/lib/libapr usr.bin/svn/lib/libap... Message-ID: <20130629083745.GA23121@server.rulingia.com> In-Reply-To: <201306180253.r5I2rj45053959@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201306180253.r5I2rj45053959@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2013-Jun-18 02:53:45 +0000, Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >Author: peter >Date: Tue Jun 18 02:53:45 2013 >New Revision: 251886 >URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/251886 > >Log: > Introduce svnlite so that we can check out our source code again. Somewhat late and to take a tack that wasn't used in the previous thread... This means we now have 2 copies of SQLite in base - there was already an older one in Heimdal. Is there any chance that we could make Heimdal use the newly added SQLite? (I'm not suggesting peter@ does this, just wondering if there's a reason for not getting rid of one copy of SQLite). (I'm concerned in general at the duplication of code in base - we already have about 4 copies of gzip and 2 different IEEE floating point emulators). --=20 Peter Jeremy --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlHOnNkACgkQ/opHv/APuIf+IwCgweXLZwD++7NRnFKKIoVdmhza lJEAnjOS/rZBBzG7fVLBuR14+WKdUdk5 =90hC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130629083745.GA23121>