Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:39:24 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 203910] www/sogo: Update to 2.3.2_2. Fix compiler warnings. Message-ID: <bug-203910-13-tIqjDBukud@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-203910-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-203910-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203910 --- Comment #13 from Euan Thoms <euan@potensol.com> --- (In reply to David Chisnall from comment #12) I agree with your logic completely, and I did ponder about this. The thing is, it's marked experimental because ActiveSync is new and I've heard it can be a PITA to get working right. But perhaps I'm confusing it with OpenChange. I want to encourage feedback since I don't use it myself. I think if they have to actively engage in the port option, and report back with good results, and suggest making it default. That will give me more confidence. Kubilay, Kurt, Martin, your thoughts? Cast your votes if you wish. Certainly I will make a slave port, if possible. When I get some time and I'm confident the ActiveSync plugin works OK on FreeBSD. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-203910-13-tIqjDBukud>