Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 19:56:18 -0500 From: Tom Legg <tjlegg@shore.net> To: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com>, Matt Loschert <loschert@servint.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions source-upgrading 3.4-s to 4.0-s Message-ID: <p04310100b501bd7cc467@[207.244.92.51]> In-Reply-To: <200003242044.PAA00854@world.std.com> References: <200003242044.PAA00854@world.std.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 3:44 PM -0500 3/24/2000, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: > >From loschert@servint.com Fri Mar 24 14:02:06 2000 >>Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:55:23 -0500 (EST) >>Subject: Re: Questions source-upgrading 3.4-s to 4.0-s >> > >On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: > >>Use the following to get all 4.0-STABLE source including crypto: >>src-all > >Of course... :) > >>cvs-crypto > >UPDATING says "Crypto & secure are now required." That, as I >understand would be src-crypto and src-secure. How would these >differ from cvs-crypto? Ie. would it be "better" to use those 2 >"tags" or to use the one cvs-crypto? I suppose what I may be >asking is "how do I make my new system look most like the >distributed CDs?" Well those two are missing src-sys-crypto which is the kicker. You can build a GENERIC kernel without src-sys-crytpo, but I know that a custom kernel with IPSEC will not build without these sources. I'm not sure how the newly built in ssh and ssl support are affected by a lack of src-sys-crypto. Any of the developers care to answer that one? And cvs-crypto is an umbrella tag that includes src-crypto, src-secure, and src-sys-crypto. One versus three. Your choice. -- ----- Tom Legg tjlegg@shore.net http://www.shore.net/~tjlegg/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p04310100b501bd7cc467>