Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 09:05:33 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 271394] 13.2 IPSEC IPv6 UDP encapsulation not implemented - PATCH attached to implement it Message-ID: <bug-271394-227-l1qjCMLWSH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-271394-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-271394-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D271394 --- Comment #4 from Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> --- Why is NAT-T needed for IPv6? The main (the only ?) promise of IPv6 is to g= et rid of the NAT. Then, the technique to improve NAT traversal for ipsec mig= ht be not too useful. On the other hand, it is a different encapsulation which could have applica= tion by itself. Can you please explain your use for NAT-T over IPv6? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-271394-227-l1qjCMLWSH>