Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 20:29:06 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> To: bde@zeta.org.au Cc: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV, nnd@mail.nsk.ru, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 'machine/param.h' required for 'sys/socket.h' Message-ID: <20000325202906C.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003252142050.654-100000@alphplex.bde.org> References: <20000325191659G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003252142050.654-100000@alphplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > So I think machine/param.h should be included from > > sys/socket.h for more portability. > > <machine/param.h> can't be included in any standard header > (except in <sys/param.h>) because it gives massive, undocumented > namespace pollution. The macro `MACHINE' is especially likely > to conflict with an application macro. Thanks again for your advice(and sorry for my ignorance). > Instead, CMSG* should use _ALIGN() and _ALIGN() should be implemented > somewhere that doesn't add any namespace pollution. We currently > use <machine/ansi.h> for things like this, but it is already too > overloaded. > > Bruce OK, then how about creating machine/align.h? Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000325202906C.shin>