Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:58:34 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux vs. Windows Message-ID: <3EF4567A.23525.2ACFD52E@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20030621164515.GA7088@daemon.li> References: <002201c33812$5b881e80$c601a8c0@starfly>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 Jun 2003 at 18:45, Josef El-Rayes wrote: > Peter <pfak@telus.net> wrote: > > Found an interesting article on TechTV, seems to portray FreeBSD in a very > > good light. Might be good for some promotional thing, to print out and > > distribute. > > although i find this quite nice it seems to be a bit too much of > pro-freebsd. it also needs some updating. linux has got a journaling > filesystem, ext2 is not the choice anymore. commercial support is better > for linux than for freebsd. i also think that linux has usually a better > device driver support, or put it this way, a broader variety. It should also be comparing Windows XP, not Windows 2000. I don't think we'd like it if they looking at FreeBSD 4.2... -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EF4567A.23525.2ACFD52E>