Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Mar 2018 13:44:16 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        apache@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 226557] If WITHOUT_MODULES set - some ports build fail
Message-ID:  <bug-226557-16115-r4KLXEadEl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-226557-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-226557-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226557

Bernard Spil <brnrd@freebsd.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |brnrd@freebsd.org,
                   |                            |freebsd-docs@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #8 from Bernard Spil <brnrd@freebsd.org> ---
Looking at it, this has always been a problematic thing... The variables in
/etc/make.conf affect both base and ports. If modules happen to have
overlapping names this will lead to unexpected behavior.

As man src.conf says "source build options" that is where I would expect th=
at
we document WITH_/WITHOUT_MODULES. Should we assign this to docs@?

Additionally, I think we should mark both WITH_ and WITHOUT_MODULES as
UNSUPPORTED in Mk/bsd.sanity.mk. Now there's checks that emit the warning as
seen in the opening Description for lang/tcl86. For the www/apache24 ports =
we
set then to IGNORE in the ports framework.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226557-16115-r4KLXEadEl>