Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:55:35 +0300
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Harti Brandt <harti@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Tomas Verbaitis <tomasv@megalogika.lt>
Subject:   Re: problems during upgrade to RELENG_5
Message-ID:  <20040824165535.GH37217@ip.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20040824184623.K517@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
References:  <20040824130849.GA12431@megalogika.lt> <20040824170917.Y517@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <20040824163608.GD37217@ip.net.ua> <20040824184623.K517@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--/9ZOS6odDaRI+0hI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 06:48:55PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>=20
> RE>On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 05:11:32PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> RE>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Tomas Verbaitis wrote:
> RE>>=20
> RE>> TV>2) Next failure was this:
> RE>> TV>=3D=3D=3D> snmp_atm
> RE>> TV>cat
> RE>> TV>/usr/src/lib/libbsnmp/modules/snmp_atm/../../../../contrib/ngatm/=
snmp_atm/atm_tree.def
> RE>> TV>/usr/src/lib/libbsnmp/modules/snmp_atm/atm_freebsd.def | gensnmpt=
ree -e
> RE>> TV>begemotAtm > atm_oid.h
> RE>> TV>line 110: junk after closing ')'
> RE>>=20
> RE>> The problem seems to be that it is running an old gensnmptree from=
=20
> RE>> /usr/bin although it should build and run a new one. Can you tell me=
 what=20
> RE>> is the __FreeBSD_version in /usr/include/osreldate.h on the system y=
ou are=20
> RE>> trying to upgrade?
> RE>>=20
> RE>Harti, nothing to worry about, you can safely close PR.  This is what
> RE>happens when people do "make includes" without understanding that it
> RE>will ruin their build environment.  ``make buildworld OSRELDATE=3D0''
> RE>usually helps these pour souls.  ;)
>=20
> Ok. I was now half an hour thinking about the versions. It was my fault=
=20
> that I did not bump the FreeBSD_version then, so the actual commit of the=
=20
> gensnmptree is between two version bumps. I choose the later one for the=
=20
> check in Makefile.inc1 and think this should be safe.
>=20
It should be okay, and I thought we already fixed this in Makefile.inc1 by
using the correct __FreeBSD_version check.  Ask for the

``ls -l /usr/include/osreldate.h /usr/bin/gensnmptree''

output when diagnosing the problem -- like I said, chances are good that
people fooled their build environment to think it's more fresh than is
actually.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--/9ZOS6odDaRI+0hI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBK3MHqRfpzJluFF4RAoORAKCLGRnprY0if2aVMvxl6vxkr6G5rgCfUoHS
iKpXYrYPn6hn6rUQZHhIEls=
=JSnj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/9ZOS6odDaRI+0hI--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040824165535.GH37217>