Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:40:13 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 db_trace.c Message-ID: <20070220144012.GX39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <200702191849.54339.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200702191057.l1JAvmZW059331@repoman.freebsd.org> <200702191849.54339.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 06:49:53PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 19 February 2007 05:57, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > kib 2007-02-19 10:57:48 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > sys/i386/i386 db_trace.c > > Log: > > Unbreak ddb stepping over special frames after the following commit: > > amd64 might need the same fix, and kgdb needs to be updated for both as > well if it hasn't been already. I doubt it. Register calling conventions for amd64 made the same change for this architecture to look like movq %rsp, %rdi thus not modifying stack frame layout. Could someone with amd64 current box confirm/deny this ? Kgdb is more involved. I think that some compatibility stuff needed there, to be able to step over both old and new kind of frames. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF2whMC3+MBN1Mb4gRAreTAJ9D6ESGdrLQ299J1rbK+CuyEjyArACfSZnO jKzwjS8sj1TH4axfYTRa4Mg= =9hH8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070220144012.GX39168>