Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:08:26 +0200 From: "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@gmail.com> To: "Rene Ladan" <r.c.ladan@gmail.com> Cc: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE/SCHED_SMP diff for 7.0 Message-ID: <b41c75520707191108n26efd3c4u585ce6395c8f7112@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <469FA6C2.4090202@gmail.com> References: <20070716233030.D92541@10.0.0.1> <469E83F8.3090103@gmail.com> <20070718142649.Y561@10.0.0.1> <469E897B.7080100@gmail.com> <20070718150613.W561@10.0.0.1> <469E9BDB.7020500@gmail.com> <20070718161652.G561@10.0.0.1> <469FA6C2.4090202@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > This is definitely a KSE/ULE problem. Can you try > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/sched_ule.c? I have made some changes > > that may fix this. > > cvsuped today at 17:23 UTC and replaced sched_ule.c afterwards. The almost-instant > panics are gone. Also, the oddity I reported about ULE/BOINC on this list earlier > has been fixed by the new sched_ule.c, I've noticed however that the WCPU field in > top sometimes exceeds 100% (this wasn't the case with sched_4bsd). Aren't they the same? Current as of 19:00 UTC +1 has ver. 1.200 which is the same as the link above. -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b41c75520707191108n26efd3c4u585ce6395c8f7112>