Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 23:57:45 +0200 From: Olivier Houchard <mlfbsd@ci0.org> To: Berislav Purgar <bpurgar@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: AVILA kernel Message-ID: <20131022215744.GA63463@ci0.org> In-Reply-To: <CAAUsrB6Z-mn-oEAi8q6JLc-%2BrQzLk2PW58GkotLXGiWhf5COqw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAAUsrB5UOq%2BSJ0SW8NOiKwxR0%2BJyfzJhakdkuAvyQMi6Gv5CNw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAUsrB6Z-mn-oEAi8q6JLc-%2BrQzLk2PW58GkotLXGiWhf5COqw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 07:54:03PM +0200, Berislav Purgar wrote: > :( .. still no solutions for this problem ? > > Beri Hi Berislav, I just tested, and apart from a few issues with the npe driver which I fixed, it seems to work fine. My board has 128MB of RAM, but I tried to limit it to 64MB, and it worked as well. Can you test the kernel at http://www.ci0.org/kernel and tell me if it works for you ? If not, I'll dig in my stuff to see if I can find another avila board. The only thing I can think of, on top of my mind, is I'm still using gcc to compile my kernels, and you may be using clang. As I don't think clang has been tested much with big-endian arm, maybe there're a few issues there. If you're using it, can you try to switch to gcc to see if it is any better ? Thanks ! Olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131022215744.GA63463>