Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 21:01:32 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: yar@comp.chem.msu.su Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, keramida@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SENDMAIL_MC & making world Message-ID: <20051009.210132.13313527.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20051009173106.GB9137@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20051009082017.GB81198@comp.chem.msu.su> <20051009171512.GA2523@flame.pc> <20051009173106.GB9137@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20051009173106.GB9137@comp.chem.msu.su>
Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> writes:
: On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 08:15:12PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
: >
: > I've always found __MAKE_CONF very useful, but it's not documented in
: > the ``obvious'' places (i.e. the manpage). I think I should add at
: > least a note about it in the manpage of make
:
: FWIW, we have make.conf(5) manpage already, and __MAKE_CONF seems
: to belong to it better than to make(1). make(1) xrefs make.conf(5)
: already. I think I can do the job if you are busy with something
: else currently.
__MAKE_CONF should be documented in make(1) since it is in
/usr/share/mk/sys.mk and global to the entire system for all make jobs
(not just those controlled by buildworld). It should also be in
make.conf(5).
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051009.210132.13313527.imp>